KONDAKOV -- IX

Page 65

 

Socio-cultural and historical analogies between different periods far removed from each other in time acquire here a special significance: the Time of Troubles at the turn of the XVI-XVII centuries, the period of the two revolutions of 1917 and the Civil War which followed them, the recent dramatic disintegration of the USSR; the despotic regimes of Ivan the Terrible, Peter the Great, Nicolai I, Lenin and Stalin; the liberal reforms of Catherine II, Alexander I, Alexander II, Stolypin, Khrushchev, and so on. Socio-cultural correspondences between such distant epochs are fully understandable in light of the unity of mind-set of Russian civilization. With the aid of such cultural-historical analogies, it is easy to be convinced of the continuity of different cultural and historical periods and of the rhythmic nature of periodic, semantic coincidences observed between different phases of the historical process. Finally, it is easy to be convinced, practically speaking, of the unchanging (meta-historical) nature of the mind-set of Russian culture and civilization, taken as a whole – that is, when viewed in terms of its uninterrupted historical continuity.